Post by mistyssaktersfo33 on Dec 21, 2023 3:49:22 GMT
In cooperation with the Austrian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, eight complaints were lodged against streaming services such as Streaming and Streaming in October 2019, saying they failed to fully respect the right of access under Article by the Austrian Data Protection Agency on a complaint against the Vienna-based streaming service Vliemit in early September, exactly one and a half years after the complaint was filed. The statutory time limit for a decision in Austria is six months.
The decision was taken after the filing of the so-called late complaint to the court gave three months for a decision. 's data protection lawyers said we are pleased that one of our complaints has finally been resolved. Yet the fact that it took us a year and a half to file a complaint with the Austrian Federal Administrative Court is very disappointing. enforceability. The legal period Email Marketing List in Austria is actually six months. The lack of a substantive analysis of the grounds for the complaint dismissed Noah's complaint on the merits but not because the complaint was without merit. The ground for refusal was simply the provision of missing information during the proceedings relating to the original information to whom the complainant's data had been communicated.
This ex post facto compliance by the data controller allows the closure of the complaints procedure without the need to investigate whether a breach has occurred. At the same time it allows companies to comply only if a complaint occurs and still avoid any fines. In simple terms Austrian data protection law provides that the complaints procedure must be closed if the alleged breach is corrected during the complaints procedure. As a company even if you are clearly in violation you will therefore receive a special invitation every time before you are actually fined.
The decision was taken after the filing of the so-called late complaint to the court gave three months for a decision. 's data protection lawyers said we are pleased that one of our complaints has finally been resolved. Yet the fact that it took us a year and a half to file a complaint with the Austrian Federal Administrative Court is very disappointing. enforceability. The legal period Email Marketing List in Austria is actually six months. The lack of a substantive analysis of the grounds for the complaint dismissed Noah's complaint on the merits but not because the complaint was without merit. The ground for refusal was simply the provision of missing information during the proceedings relating to the original information to whom the complainant's data had been communicated.
This ex post facto compliance by the data controller allows the closure of the complaints procedure without the need to investigate whether a breach has occurred. At the same time it allows companies to comply only if a complaint occurs and still avoid any fines. In simple terms Austrian data protection law provides that the complaints procedure must be closed if the alleged breach is corrected during the complaints procedure. As a company even if you are clearly in violation you will therefore receive a special invitation every time before you are actually fined.